Weill v. Cornell
69 Ill. App. 60, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 268
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The principal contention of appellant is, that a witness was improperly permitted to testify to the contents of a written contract of employment.
Appellant’s objection tp such testimony was general only. The objection should have been specific; the matter of the testimony was competent. Norton v. Dow, 5 Gil. 459; Swift v. Whitney, 20 Ill. 144; Wright v. Smith, 82 Ill. 527; Cox v. Gerkin, 38 Ill. App. 340; Conway v. Case, 22 Ill. 127.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weill v. Cornell, 69 Ill. App. 60, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 268 (Ill. Ct. App. 1897).
69 Ill. App. 60 (Weill v. Cornell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swift v. Whitney
20 Ill. 144 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1858)
Conway v. Case
22 Ill. 127 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1859)
Wright v. Smith
82 Ill. 527 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1876)
Cox v. Gerkin
38 Ill. App. 340 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)