Weill v. Cornell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Weill v. Cornell

69 Ill. App. 60, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 268

DecidedMarch 8, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 69 Ill. App. 60 (Weill v. Cornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weill v. Cornell, 69 Ill. App. 60, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 268 (Ill. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The principal contention of appellant is, that a witness was improperly permitted to testify to the contents of a written contract of employment.

Appellant’s objection tp such testimony was general only. The objection should have been specific; the matter of the testimony was competent. Norton v. Dow, 5 Gil. 459; Swift v. Whitney, 20 Ill. 144; Wright v. Smith, 82 Ill. 527; Cox v. Gerkin, 38 Ill. App. 340; Conway v. Case, 22 Ill. 127.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI