Weiler v. Weiler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Weiler v. Weiler

704 S.W.2d 290

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 4, 1986

DocketNo. 49673

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 704 S.W.2d 290 (Weiler v. Weiler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiler v. Weiler, 704 S.W.2d 290 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

CRIST, Judge.

Dissolution case. Mother contests the award to father of the primary custody of the two minor children. We affirm.

Mother states the award of custody was against the weight of the evidence by reason of sexual misconduct of father, among other things. The trial court did not believe the witness who testified to such alleged sexual misconduct. After reviewing the record, we are unable to substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law apears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRIST, Judge.

Dissolution case. Mother contests the award to father of the primary custody of the two minor children. We affirm.

Mother states the award of custody was against the weight of the evidence by reason of sexual misconduct of father, among other things. The trial court did not believe the witness who testified to such alleged sexual misconduct. After reviewing the record, we are unable to substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law apears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, J„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 S.W.2d 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiler-v-weiler-moctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack