Weiler v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.

119 A.D. 917, 105 N.Y.S. 1149

This text of 119 A.D. 917 (Weiler v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weiler v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co., 119 A.D. 917, 105 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented on the ground that the court committed error in refusing to charge as requested; that it was plaintiff’s duty to look before'eross- ■ ing the tracks, and that plaintiff had no right to take doubtful chances as to whether or not he could cross in safety.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D. 917, 105 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiler-v-syracuse-rapid-transit-railway-co-nyappdiv-1907.