Weiland v. Forgotston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weiland v. Forgotston

44 A.D. 633, 60 N.Y.S. 1150

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D. 633 (Weiland v. Forgotston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weiland v. Forgotston, 44 A.D. 633, 60 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Patterson, J.:

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Weiland v. Forgotston, decided herewith (ante, p. 54), the interlocutory judgment must be affirmed, with costs, but with permission to the demurring defendant, on the payment of costs in this court and in the court below, to withdraw the demurrer and answer within twenty days from the entry of the order of affirmance to be made hereon. Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey and O’Brien, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson, J.:

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Weiland v. Forgotston, decided herewith (ante, p. 54), the interlocutory judgment must be affirmed, with costs, but with permission to the demurring defendant, on the payment of costs in this court and in the court below, to withdraw the demurrer and answer within twenty days from the entry of the order of affirmance to be made hereon. Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey and O’Brien, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D. 633, 60 N.Y.S. 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weiland-v-forgotston-nyappdiv-1899.