Weil v. United States

124 F. 1006, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 1900
DocketNo. 2,706
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 F. 1006 (Weil v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weil v. United States, 124 F. 1006, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959 (circtsdny 1900).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These Russian calfskins do not appear to be raw hides of cattle, under paragraph 437, Schedule N, § 1, c. 11, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, 30 Stat. 192 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1676), where they were assessed. If not “furs, undressed,” under paragraph 561, Free List,. § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 198 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1683), nor “fur skins,” undressed, under paragraph 562 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1683), they would seem to be either skins or hides [1007]*1007not specially provided for in that act, under paragraph 664, Free List, § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 201 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1688), and free. The protest, which is questioned, appears to be well enough, according to U. S. v. Salambier, 170 U. S. 621, 18 Sup. Ct. 771, 42 L. Ed. 1167.

Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Malone
12 Ct. Cust. 178 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 F. 1006, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weil-v-united-states-circtsdny-1900.