Weil v. United States

124 F. 1006, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 16, 1900·No. No. 2,706·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

These Russian calfskins do not appear to be raw hides of cattle, under paragraph 437, Schedule N, § 1, c. 11, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, 30 Stat. 192 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1676), where they were assessed. If not “furs, undressed,” under paragraph 561, Free List,. § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 198 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1683), nor “fur skins,” undressed, under paragraph 562 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1683), they would seem to be either skins or hides [1007] not specially provided for in that act, under paragraph 664, Free List, § 2, c. 11, 30 Stat. 201 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1688), and free. The protest, which is questioned, appears to be well enough, according to U. S. v. Salambier, 170 U. S. 621, 18 Sup. Ct. 771, 42 L. Ed. 1167.

Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weil v. United States, 124 F. 1006, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4959 (circtsdny 1900).

124 F. 1006 (Weil v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Malone
12 Ct. Cust. 178 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)