Weil v. F. I. A. T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weil v. F. I. A. T.

163 A.D. 908, 147 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 908 (Weil v. F. I. A. T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weil v. F. I. A. T., 163 A.D. 908, 147 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence both as to negligence and the extent and gravity of plaintiff’s injuries was conflicting, and, therefore, the jury were to determine the credibility and weight to be given to this testimony. As there was evidence to sustain their verdict, and appellant’s exceptions to the rulings of the court below present no error, we find no ground to interfere with the verdict and the judgment entered thereon. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence both as to negligence and the extent and gravity of plaintiff’s injuries was conflicting, and, therefore, the jury were to determine the credibility and weight to be given to this testimony. As there was evidence to sustain their verdict, and appellant’s exceptions to the rulings of the court below present no error, we find no ground to interfere with the verdict and the judgment entered thereon. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 908, 147 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weil-v-f-i-a-t-nyappdiv-1914.