Weil v. Commissioner
92 F.2d 1022, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 379, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4857
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 11, 1937·No. No. 7141·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed on authority of Southern Abstract & Loan Co. v. Commissioner, 72 F.2d 130 (C.C.A.6). See, also, Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 269, 273, 53 S.Ct. 337, 77 L.Ed. ,739; Moran v. Commissioner, 67 F.2d 601, (C.C.A.1) ; Commissioner v. Moore, 48 F.2d 526, for principles applicable. There was no error in refusing to receive amended return, since proofs thereunder, if made, would result in duplication of deductions. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weil v. Commissioner, 92 F.2d 1022, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 379, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4857 (6th Cir. 1937).
92 F.2d 1022 (Weil v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. George M. Jones Co.
152 F.2d 358 (Sixth Circuit, 1945)
Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Laguna Land & W. Co.
118 F.2d 112 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)