Weil v. Chu
515 N.E.2d 908, 70 N.Y.2d 783, 521 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18956
Opinion
[785]*785OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (120 AD2d 781).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weil v. Chu, 515 N.E.2d 908, 70 N.Y.2d 783, 521 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18956 (N.Y. 1987).
515 N.E.2d 908 (Weil v. Chu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lanzi v. Alabama Dept. of Revenue
968 So. 2d 18 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2006)
Hickey v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
208 A.D.2d 1125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Leach v. Chu
150 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Farmer v. State Tax Commission
144 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
595 Investors Ltd. Partnership v. Biderman
140 Misc. 2d 441 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
Spivak v. State Tax Commission
135 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)