Weil v. Bent
60 Cal. 603
This text of 60 Cal. 603 (Weil v. Bent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weil v. Bent, 60 Cal. 603 (Cal. 1882).
Opinion
This is an appeal by defendant Palomares from a default judgment. The affidavit of service of summons does not show that affiant was over the age of eighteen years at the time of the service. On authority of Maynard v. McCrellish, 57 Cal. 855, and Howard v Galloway, supra, p. 10.
Judgment is reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Horton v. Gallardo
26 P. 375 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Barney v. Vigoureaux
17 P. 433 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 Cal. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weil-v-bent-cal-1882.