Weil v. American Insurance

138 N.E. 698, 79 Ind. App. 703, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 78
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 1923·No. No. 11,503·Published

Opinion

McMahan, J.

Complaint by appellants on a contract of fire insurance covering the same stock of wool as was covered by the policy involved in Weil v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. (1923), ante 421, 138 N. E. 696.

Appellants’ demurrer to the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh paragraphs of answer was overruled and appellants refusing to plead further judgment was rendered against them. The fifth paragraph of answer in the instant case is the same as the seventh paragraph of answer in Weil v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., supra, which was held good, and on the authority of that case we hold there was no error in overruling the demurrer to the fifth paragraph of answer in the instant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weil v. American Insurance, 138 N.E. 698, 79 Ind. App. 703, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 78 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923).

138 N.E. 698 (Weil v. American Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weil v. Connecticut Fire Insurance
138 N.E. 696 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1923)