Weightman v. Clark

103 U.S. 256, 26 L. Ed. 392, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2112
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 28, 1881
Docket194
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 103 U.S. 256 (Weightman v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weightman v. Clark, 103 U.S. 256, 26 L. Ed. 392, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2112 (1881).

Opinion

*257 Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

By the Constitution of Illinois, adopted in 1848, counties were recognized as existing political subdivisions of the State, and the General Assembly was authorized to provide by a general law for a township organization, under which any county might come, whenever a majority of the voters should, at any general election, so determine. If a county did adopt a township organization, the management of its fiscal affairs by the county court might be dispensed with, and the business of the county transacted in such manner as the General Assembly should provide. Art. 7, sect. 6. Under the authority of this provision of the Constitution, an act was passed by the Genéral Assembly authorizing such an organization, by which townships could be established and made bodies corporate, with certain defined governmental powers. Gross, Stat. 1869, p. 741.

By another statute each congressional township in the State was “ established a township for school purposes.” Id., p. 691. The business of such a township was' to be done by three trustees, to be elected from time to time by the legal voters of the township, and who were made “ a body politic and corporate, by the name and style of ‘ trustees of schools of township-, range-,’ according to the number.” The powers of these trustees related exclusively to the business of the public schools in the township. They had authority to lay off the township into school districts and apportion the school funds, and were charged with .certain other duties connected with school affairs and school lands within their jurisdiction. They had no power to levy taxes. That was to be done by the directors of the several school districts which should be created.

Art. 9, sect. 5, of the Constitution of 1848 is as follows:—

“ The corporate authorities of counties, townships, school districts, cities, towns, and villages may be vested with power to assess and collect taxes for corporate purposes; such taxes to be uniform in respect to persons and property within the jurisdiction of the body imposing the(same. And the General Assembly shall require that all the property within the limits of municipal corporations, belonging to individuals, shall be taxed for the payment of debts contracted under authority of law.” -

*258 The Illinois Farmers’ Railroad Company was incorporated Feb.'28, 1867, and by an amendment to its charter, passed April 15, 1869, the following provisions were made: —

“ Sect. 2. It shall be lawful for the corporate authorities of the towns, townships, cities, and counties through which said road shall pass, to take stock in the said company; and shall also be empowered to make assessments, levy taxes, and collect the same in the manner in which the said several towns, townships, cities, and counties assess and collect taxes, for the purpose of paying the said assessments on the subscriptions to the said stock or the interest accruing thereon, and the said towns, townships, cities, and counties may issue bonds, bearing interest, at any point they may designate, either within or without the State of Illinois, at a rate not.exceeding ten per cent per annum, payable annually or semi-annually, as they may elect: Provided, that the said townships, cities, or towns shall not subscribe to the stock of the said company without submitting the said proposed subscription to a vote of the legal voters of their respective towns, townships, or cities, thirty days’ notice of which shall be given, elections held and returns made as provided by the general election laws of this State: And provided further, that no such bonds shall issue, nor shall any interest be payable thereon or accrue, until said road is completed through the said town, township, city, or county: And provided further, that the subscriptions on the part of the said counties shall not be for a sum exceeding two thousand dollars per mile of the line' of the said road in the said counties.
“ Sect. 3. In counties not under township organization it shall be lawful for the trustees of schools to make subscriptions for their respective townships, and issue bonds as provided in the preceding section; and for the purpose of paying the said subscriptions or bonds, or the interest thereon, shall levy a tax, not exceeding the rate of one per cent per annum, upon the taxable property of their respective townships, and shall, through their treasurer, certify the said assessment to the clerk of the county court of their respective counties, and it shall be the duty of the said clerk of the county court to carry out the tax so assessed upon the collector’s book; and the amount so raised by taxation shall remain in the hands of the treasurer of the proper county, and shall be employed by him in paying, first, the interest due on the said bonds, and then the principal, if any funds shall remain in-his hands, and for no other purpose.”

*259 The county of Morgan, through which the road of this com* pany passed, was not under township organization, and on the 1st of February, 1870, at an election called, the voters of congressional township No. 14 N., of range 9 W. of the third principal meridian, within that county, voted to subscribe to the stock of the company in accordance with the provisions of sect. 3 of the amended charter. Upon the, authority of this vote the trustees of schools of the township made the subscription and issued thirty-two bonds of $1,000 each, bearing date Oct. 1, 1870, to make the required payment. These bonds were after-wards registered with the auditor of public accounts, and, upon his' certificate to the clerk of the County Court of Morgan County, taxes were levied on the taxable property in the township to meet the interest as it fell due. In this way the interest for the years 1871,1872,1873, and 1874 was paid; but in 1875 the taxpayers of the township commenced this suit in a State court to enjoin any further taxation to meet the. bonds, on the ground that there was no authority in law either for the subscription or the issue of the bonds. That suit was transferred by the bondholders from the State Court to the. Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois, where; on final hearing, the prayer of the taxpayers, complainants, was granted. To reverse that decree this appeal was taken.

It is clear that art. 9, sect. 5, of the Constitution is a limitation on the power of the legislature to authorize taxation by public corporations or the political subdivisions of the State. The Supreme Court of the State has uniformly so decided. Johnson v. Campbell, 49 Ill. 316; Harward v. St. Clair Drainage Co., 51 id. 130; Madison County v. People, 58 id. 456. The same court also decided, in Trustees, & c. v. People (63 id. 299), People v. Dupuyt (71 id. 651), and People v. Trustees of Schools (78 id. 136), that statutes substantially like the one now under consideration were unconstitutional, and consequently void, because the tax required was not for a corporate purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaud v. Walker
53 S.E.2d 316 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
City of Portland v. Multnomah County
50 P.2d 1145 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)
City of Jacksonville v. Oldham
150 So. 619 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Battle v. Willcox
122 S.E. 516 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)
Lillard v. Melton
87 S.E. 421 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1915)
Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.
220 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1911)
O'Brien v. Wheelock
95 F. 883 (Seventh Circuit, 1899)
Neale v. County Court of Wood County
27 S.E. 370 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1897)
Earles v. Wells
68 N.W. 964 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)
Folsom v. Ninety Six
159 U.S. 611 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Floyd v. Perrin
2 L.R.A. 242 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1888)
Wetherell v. Devine
6 N.E. 24 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1886)
Ottawa v. Carey
108 U.S. 110 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Bartholow v. Trustees
105 U.S. 6 (Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 U.S. 256, 26 L. Ed. 392, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weightman-v-clark-scotus-1881.