Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Mark

263 A.D.2d 491, 691 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7887
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 263 A.D.2d 491 (Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Mark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Mark, 263 A.D.2d 491, 691 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated July 29, 1998, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[492]*492The Supreme Court properly determined that the subject arbitration was barred by the expiration of the six-year Statute of Limitations governing breach of contract claims and properly declined to send the issue of the statutory time limitation to the arbitrator for a determination (see, CPLR 7502 [b]; 7503 [b]; Matter of Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v Luckie, 85 NY2d 193). In addition, the Supreme Court properly determined that the assertions of fraudulent concealment with respect to the breach of contract claim did not serve to extend the Statute of Limitations (see, Cabrini Med. Ctr. v Desina, 64 NY2d 1059, 1061; Matter of Nassau Suffolk Radiological Assocs. v Tugendhaft, 236 AD2d 411; Tomkins PLC v Bangor Punta Consol. Corp., 194 AD2d 493, 494; Matter of Thaler v Skydell, 150 AD2d 261).

The appellant’s remaining contentions either lack merit or are improperly raised for the first time on appeal. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Volpe v. Volpe
16 A.D.3d 1176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Travelers Property Casualty Corp. v. Lee
283 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D.2d 491, 691 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weight-watchers-international-inc-v-mark-nyappdiv-1999.