Weigel v. Weigel

5 Watts 486
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 1836
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 5 Watts 486 (Weigel v. Weigel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weigel v. Weigel, 5 Watts 486 (Pa. 1836).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The signature of a party is prima fa^ie evidence of execution; and though it is less forcible than if the body of the instrument were also in his handwriting, the difference is but in the degree. A man may be more readily entrapped where he did not write the paper, for it is less certain that he knew its contents; yet the legal presumption, till rebutted, is in favour of fairness; and it coincides in this instance, with the presumption which the law deduces from the ordinary routine of business in the course of affairs. Though the alleged will was not in the handwriting of the testator, his signature was at least evidence to go to the jury.

Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ligo v. Dodson
151 A. 694 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Sheer v. Sheer
43 N.E. 334 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1895)
Frew v. Clarke
80 Pa. 170 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1876)
Yoe v. McCord
74 Ill. 33 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1874)
Wigle v. Wigle
6 Watts 522 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1837)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Watts 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weigel-v-weigel-pa-1836.