Weigel v. Weigel

54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 398, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 286
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 4, 1903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for. the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees — 9. For reversal — Dixon, Vroom — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weigel v. Weigel, 54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 398, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 286 (N.J. 1903).

54 A. 1125 (Weigel v. Weigel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Brien v. O'Brien
142 A. 898 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)