Weidmann v. . Borden
114 N.E. 1075, 219 N.Y. 611, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 946
This text of 114 N.E. 1075 (Weidmann v. . Borden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weidmann v. . Borden, 114 N.E. 1075, 219 N.Y. 611, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 946 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozc and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., is of the opinion that the evidence as to the value was inadmissible, and he concurs upon the ground that the error was not harmful under the circumstances.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 N.E. 1075, 219 N.Y. 611, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weidmann-v-borden-ny-1916.