Weidmann v. . Borden
114 N.E. 1075, 219 N.Y. 611, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 946
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozc and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., is of the opinion that the evidence as to the value was inadmissible, and he concurs upon the ground that the error was not harmful under the circumstances.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weidmann v. . Borden, 114 N.E. 1075, 219 N.Y. 611, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 946 (N.Y. 1916).
114 N.E. 1075 (Weidmann v. . Borden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.