Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. v. Mayor of Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. v. Mayor of Newark

105 A. 195, 89 N.J. Eq. 579, 4 Stock. 579, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 340

DecidedNovember 18, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 195 (Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. v. Mayor of Newark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. v. Mayor of Newark, 105 A. 195, 89 N.J. Eq. 579, 4 Stock. 579, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 340 (N.J. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of the meritorious question is controlled by the memorandum in No. 47. See ante p. 541. The only matter calling for further remark is the contention of the city that the compensation for the diversion of water should be ascertained by the chancellor instead of in condemnation proceedings by a jury. It is enough to say that the chancellor is not obliged to take that course. We need not consider whether he might have taken it if the complainant had consented.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner-12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decision of the meritorious question is controlled by the memorandum in No. 47. See ante p. 541. The only matter calling for further remark is the contention of the city that the compensation for the diversion of water should be ascertained by the chancellor instead of in condemnation proceedings by a jury. It is enough to say that the chancellor is not obliged to take that course. We need not consider whether he might have taken it if the complainant had consented.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner-12.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A. 195, 89 N.J. Eq. 579, 4 Stock. 579, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weidmann-silk-dyeing-co-v-mayor-of-newark-nj-1918.