Weidman v. Klot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weidman v. Klot

10 A.D.2d 672, 202 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11462

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 672 (Weidman v. Klot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weidman v. Klot, 10 A.D.2d 672, 202 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the cross appeal to be heard on the original record filed by the defendant-appellant-respondent to which there shall be added the original cross notice of appeal filed by the plaintiffs-respondents-appellants, and upon typewritten or mimeographed points, on condition that the plaintiffs-respondents-appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed points as a cross appellant and as respondent upon the attorney for the defendant-appellant-respondent and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, with this court on or before March 20, 1960, the said cross appeal to be heard at the April 1960 Term of this court at the same time as the appeal taken by defendant-appellant-respondent from the same judgment. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the cross appeal to be heard on the original record filed by the defendant-appellant-respondent to which there shall be added the original cross notice of appeal filed by the plaintiffs-respondents-appellants, and upon typewritten or mimeographed points, on condition that the plaintiffs-respondents-appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed points as a cross appellant and as respondent upon the attorney for the defendant-appellant-respondent and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, with this court on or before March 20, 1960, the said cross appeal to be heard at the April 1960 Term of this court at the same time as the appeal taken by defendant-appellant-respondent from the same judgment. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 672, 202 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weidman-v-klot-nyappdiv-1960.