Weidenmann v. Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'n

Appellate Court of Illinois

Weidenmann v. Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'n

194 Ill. App. 464, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 518

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 17, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,360

StatusPublished

This text of 194 Ill. App. 464 (Weidenmann v. Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weidenmann v. Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'n, 194 Ill. App. 464, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 518 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Master and servant, § 30*—how contract construed as to power to discharge. In an action of assumpsit for damages for breach of a contract of employment, evidence held to establish that the parties did not construe contract so as to exclude ahy right in the employer to discharge employee if his services were unsatisfactory. 7. Master and servant, § 30*—when good faith in discharging material. Where the trial court does not consider the' question of good faith of an employer in discharging an employee because his services were unsatisfactory under a contract of employment permitting a discharge for such reason, a new trial should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Master and servant, § 30*—how contract construed as to power to discharge. In an action of assumpsit for damages for breach of a contract of employment, evidence held to establish that the parties did not construe contract so as to exclude ahy right in the employer to discharge employee if his services were unsatisfactory. 7. Master and servant, § 30*—when good faith in discharging material. Where the trial court does not consider the' question of good faith of an employer in discharging an employee because his services were unsatisfactory under a contract of employment permitting a discharge for such reason, a new trial should be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Ill. App. 464, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weidenmann-v-mount-hope-cemetery-assn-illappct-1915.