Weideman v. Ware

Sixth Circuit

Weideman v. Ware

184 F.2d 671

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 1950

DocketNos. 11101, 11102

StatusPublished

This text of 184 F.2d 671 (Weideman v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weideman v. Ware, 184 F.2d 671 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel for respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that there was substantial evidence of negligence on the part of the appellant Weideman as well as on the part of the appellant Hicks, and that the trial Judge was correct in submitting such issue to the jury with respect to both of said appellants;

And no prejudicial error appearing from the record;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel for respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that there was substantial evidence of negligence on the part of the appellant Weideman as well as on the part of the appellant Hicks, and that the trial Judge was correct in submitting such issue to the jury with respect to both of said appellants;

And no prejudicial error appearing from the record;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 F.2d 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weideman-v-ware-ca6-1950.