Weible Vs. Conner

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JUSTIN WEIBLE, No. 83057 Appellant, vs. THOMAS CONNER, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; AND THE STATE OF FILED NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR AUG 1 9 2021 VEHICLES, ELIZABETH A. BROWN Res ondents. CLERKg SUPREME COURT \ BY DEPUTY CLEI C).'A,-LII IK "It

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in a driver's license revocation matter. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Crystal Eller, Judge. According to the record before us, appellant's driver's license was revoked for 90 days beginning on September 2, 2020. Thus, the 90-day revocation period has expired. In Langston v. State, Departinent of Motor Vehicles, we recognized that after a driver's license revocation period has expired, this court is unable to grant any effective relief on appeal, such that, despite asserted potential collateral consequences, the appeal should

SUPREME COUR oe NEVADA

MI 1947A .6.611.. gi-AgaN be dismissed as moot. 110 Nev. 342, 343, 871 P.2d 362, 363 (1994). Accordingly, this appeal is moot, and we therefore ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.1

J. Par guirre

J. Stiglich

kitektoe/t) Silver

cc: Hon. Crystal Eller, District Judge Justin Weible Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1In light of this order, appellant's emergency motions for stay are denied as moot. SUPREME COURT of NEVADA

0) 1947A .1Pia> 2