Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Weible v. State

Weible v. State

774 So. 2d 899, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 37, 2001 WL 6167
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 3, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-3578
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 774 So. 2d 899 (Weible v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weible v. State, 774 So. 2d 899, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 37, 2001 WL 6167 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Through a petition for writ of prohibition David Weible seeks review of an order denying his motion to disqualify Judge Wild from presiding over his resentencing hearing upon remand. Weible v. State, 761 So.2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We find no error in the denial as the motion was not timely filed. Asay v. State, 769 So.2d 974 (Fla.2000). The trial judge’s actions and comments upon which the motion was based occurred during the sentencing hearing that was the subject of Weible, 761 So.2d at 469.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

DELL, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leach v. State
774 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
774 So. 2d 899, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 37, 2001 WL 6167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weible-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.