Weible v. State
774 So. 2d 899, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 37, 2001 WL 6167
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 3, 2001·No. No. 4D00-3578·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Through a petition for writ of prohibition David Weible seeks review of an order denying his motion to disqualify Judge Wild from presiding over his resentencing hearing upon remand. Weible v. State, 761 So.2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We find no error in the denial as the motion was not timely filed. Asay v. State, 769 So.2d 974 (Fla.2000). The trial judge’s actions and comments upon which the motion was based occurred during the sentencing hearing that was the subject of Weible, 761 So.2d at 469.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weible v. State, 774 So. 2d 899, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 37, 2001 WL 6167 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
774 So. 2d 899 (Weible v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leach v. State
774 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)