Wei v. Berg

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedApril 16, 2018
DocketCivil Action No. 2018-0627
StatusPublished

This text of Wei v. Berg (Wei v. Berg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wei v. Berg, (D.D.C. 2018).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D APR 1 6 2018

Clerk, U.S. Dlstrlct & Bankruptcy

LIQIANG WEI, ) Courts for the D|str|ct of Columbla Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. 18-0627 (UNA) JEREMY BERG, et al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the application and dismisses the complaint.

Plaintiff alleges that, in 2017, he submitted two articles to Science/AAAS for publication in its journal. See Compl., Attach. 1 at l. Defendants declined to publish the articles, see ia'., Attach. l at 1-2, and plaintiff deems their actions a “violation of the laws of civic rights, namely, his “rights of freedom of speech and expression,” id., Attach. l at 3. He brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, id. at 2, and asks the Court “to order this Science journal to have [his] two articles . . . published . . . immediately,” id., Attach. 6. ln addition, plaintiff demands “money damages . . . in the total amount of $10,550 millions.” Id., Attach. 6.

In relevant part, Section 1983 provides:

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the

Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress[.]

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (emphasis added). “To recover damages under § 1983, a plaintiff must generally show that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under color of state law.” Jora'an v. District of Columbia, 949 F. Supp. 2d 83, 89-90 (D.D.C. 2013). Plaintiff does not allege facts to show that the named defendants are employees or agents of a state or the District, of Columbia. Absent a showing that the defendant editors are state actors, plaintiffs claim under § 1983 fails. See Chandler v. W.E. Welch & Assocs., 533 F. Supp. 2d 94, 103 (D.D.C. 2008); Abu-Jamal v. Nat’l Pub. Radio, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13604 (D.D.C. Aug. 21,

1998) (per curiam).

United States Distr§t Judge

DATE¢ b///Z///§/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chandler v. W.E. Welch & Associates, Inc.
533 F. Supp. 2d 94 (District of Columbia, 2008)
Jordan Ex Rel. Y.F. v. District of Columbia
949 F. Supp. 2d 83 (District of Columbia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wei v. Berg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wei-v-berg-dcd-2018.