Wehringer v. Allen-Stevenson School

46 A.D.2d 641, 360 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1974·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 5,1974, denying the motion to dismiss the complaint unanimously reversed, on the law, and defendants’ motion is granted. Appellants shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The material alleged to be defamatory is not libelous per se (see Tracy v. Newsday, Inc., 5 N Y 2d 134; Berkson v. Time, Inc., 8 A D 2d 352, affd. 7 N Y 2d 1007), and in the absence of special damages, the complaint cannot withstand defendants’ motion' to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) for failure to state a cause of action. See O’Connell v. Press Pub. Go., 214 N. Y. 352, 358; Bauer & Fittipaldi, Inc. v. Twenty First Century Communications, 43 A D 2d 178, 179). Concur — MeGivern, P. J., Markewich, Nunez, Lupiano and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wehringer v. Allen-Stevenson School, 46 A.D.2d 641, 360 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

46 A.D.2d 641 (Wehringer v. Allen-Stevenson School) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herlihy v. Metropolitan Museum of Art
214 A.D.2d 250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Solinsky v. Arthritis Foundation
635 F. Supp. 620 (E.D. New York, 1986)
Aronson v. Wiersma
65 N.Y. 592 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Garland v. Vermilyea
88 A.D.2d 1044 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)