Wehle v. Mauz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wehle v. Mauz

48 A.D.2d 692, 367 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9732

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 A.D.2d 692 (Wehle v. Mauz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wehle v. Mauz, 48 A.D.2d 692, 367 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for the partition and sale of certain real property, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 3, 1974, as (1) conditioned the grant of a motion to vacate a default judgment upon the conditions that defendant pay (a) $300 to plaintiffs’ attorneys and (b) $500 to plaintiff [693]*693Richard W. Wehle and (2) conditioned the restoration of the case to the calendar upon the making of such payments. Order modified by deleting from the second decretal paragraph thereof the figure "$500.00” and substituting therefor the figure "$300”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The amount allowed to plaintiff Richard W. Wehle was excessive to the extent indicated. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for the partition and sale of certain real property, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 3, 1974, as (1) conditioned the grant of a motion to vacate a default judgment upon the conditions that defendant pay (a) $300 to plaintiffs’ attorneys and (b) $500 to plaintiff [693]*693Richard W. Wehle and (2) conditioned the restoration of the case to the calendar upon the making of such payments. Order modified by deleting from the second decretal paragraph thereof the figure "$500.00” and substituting therefor the figure "$300”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The amount allowed to plaintiff Richard W. Wehle was excessive to the extent indicated. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 692, 367 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wehle-v-mauz-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack