Wehle v. Bowery Savings Bank
This text of 8 Jones & S. 97 (Wehle v. Bowery Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavit on which the order appealed from was made, was sufficient to authorize the court to order an interpleader,, under § 122 of the Code. The order of Mr. Justice Gross, which is annexed to the affidavit, shows the good faith of the application, but its validity could not be determined upon the motion. That question is to be determined on the trial of the action against the party claiming under it. Nor did the opposing affidavit of the plaintiff show any grounds for refusing the order. Collusion between the party to whose rights plaintiff succeeded and the party claiming the fund from the bank under the order of Mr Justice Gross, is not enough, as long as the bank is free from it.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Speir, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Jones & S. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wehle-v-bowery-savings-bank-nysuperctnyc-1875.