Wegman v. Wegman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wegman v. Wegman

150 A.D.2d 371, 543 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 150 A.D.2d 371 (Wegman v. Wegman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wegman v. Wegman, 150 A.D.2d 371, 543 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals and the defendant husband cross-appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated January 26, 1988, which, upon remittitur, inter alia, distributed the parties’ marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

After reviewing the complete record and the claims advanced by the parties, we find that under the circumstances, the trial court achieved an equitable distribution of the parties’ property (see, Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d 1033). Further, there is no basis for disturbing the award of counsel fees to the plaintiff. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals and the defendant husband cross-appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated January 26, 1988, which, upon remittitur, inter alia, distributed the parties’ marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

After reviewing the complete record and the claims advanced by the parties, we find that under the circumstances, the trial court achieved an equitable distribution of the parties’ property (see, Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d 1033). Further, there is no basis for disturbing the award of counsel fees to the plaintiff. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 A.D.2d 371, 543 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wegman-v-wegman-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack