Weglarz v. Burkiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weglarz v. Burkiewicz

275 A.D.2d 989

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 989 (Weglarz v. Burkiewicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weglarz v. Burkiewicz, 275 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: On this record we hesitate to say that the Special Term’s refusal to punish the defendant for failure to make the payments required under the decree constituted an abuse of discretion. We find, however, no sufficient basis for the court’s refusal to grant judgment in plaintiff’s favor for the payments in arrears. Plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the sum of $1,208. All concur. (The order and judgment deny plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt of court; also deny her motion for judgment for unpaid alimony.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: On this record we hesitate to say that the Special Term’s refusal to punish the defendant for failure to make the payments required under the decree constituted an abuse of discretion. We find, however, no sufficient basis for the court’s refusal to grant judgment in plaintiff’s favor for the payments in arrears. Plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the sum of $1,208. All concur. (The order and judgment deny plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt of court; also deny her motion for judgment for unpaid alimony.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weglarz-v-burkiewicz-nyappdiv-1949.