Wegener v. Florida Department of Insurance
Opinion
This is an appeal from the denial of appellants’ motion to vacate a judgment for attorney’s fees and an appeal and cross-appeal from an order awarding attorney’s fees.1 We affirm.
The trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion to vacate the final judgment of attorney’s fees based on newly discovered evidence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(2). The evidence offered by appellant in support of the motion does not constitute newly discovered evidence within the meaning of the rule. See Dade Nat’l Bank v. Kay, 131 So.2d 24, 26-27 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 135 So.2d 746 (Fla.1961); see also Pingree v. Quaintance, 394 So.2d 161, 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
The trial court awarded appellate attorney’s fees pursuant to this court’s mandate in International Bankers Insurance Co, v. Wegener, 548 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). By cross-appeal International Bankers Insurance Co. disputes the Wegeners’ entitlement to any attorney’s fees at all. The question of entitlement was determined in the prior appeal and is the law of the case. As to the cross-appeal, we affirm.
Appellants’ request for a remand for the making of further findings is unwarranted in light of paragraph 631.181(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1989).2
Affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
590 So. 2d 455 (Wegener v. Florida Department of Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.