Wegenast v. Pheylen

195 F.2d 776, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 277, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3023
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 1952
Docket11041_1
StatusPublished

This text of 195 F.2d 776 (Wegenast v. Pheylen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wegenast v. Pheylen, 195 F.2d 776, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 277, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3023 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

Opinion

*777 PER CURIAM.

D.C.Code 1940, § 18-211 provides that if a testator’s widow renounces all claim under his will, or is left nothing in his will, she is "entitled, in addition to her dower, to the distributive share of his personal property, which she would have taken had he died intestate * * Section 18-702 provides that “If the intestate leave a widow or surviving husband and no child, parent, grandchild, brother, or sister, or the child of a brother or sister of the said intestate, the said widow or surviving husband shall be entitled to the whole.” The °District Court, 98 F.Supp. 371, rightly held that the widow of a testator who left none of the relatives enumerated in § 18-702 is entitled to the whole of his personal estate^

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wegenast v. Pheylen
98 F. Supp. 371 (District of Columbia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 F.2d 776, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 277, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wegenast-v-pheylen-cadc-1952.