Weete v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Weete v. State

1913 OK CR 236, 132 P. 1198, 9 Okla. Crim. 739, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 237

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 28, 1913

DocketNo. A-1684.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 236 (Weete v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weete v. State, 1913 OK CR 236, 132 P. 1198, 9 Okla. Crim. 739, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 237 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, F. E. Weete and Sam *740 Johnson were convicted on an information which charged the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors with the intent to violate provisions of the prohibitory law. On February 5th, 3 912, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, F. E. Weete was sentenced to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and Sam Johnson was sentenced to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal. The motion to affirm is sustained and the judgments of the county court of Tulsa county are affirmed, and the cause remanded thereto with direction to enforce its judgments therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error, F. E. Weete and Sam *740 Johnson were convicted on an information which charged the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors with the intent to violate provisions of the prohibitory law. On February 5th, 3 912, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, F. E. Weete was sentenced to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and Sam Johnson was sentenced to be confined for thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. No brief has been filed. When the case was called for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal. The motion to affirm is sustained and the judgments of the county court of Tulsa county are affirmed, and the cause remanded thereto with direction to enforce its judgments therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 236, 132 P. 1198, 9 Okla. Crim. 739, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weete-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.