Weems v. Timberlands

Eighth Circuit

Weems v. Timberlands

123 F. App'x 268

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2031

StatusPublished

This text of 123 F. App'x 268 (Weems v. Timberlands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weems v. Timberlands, 123 F. App'x 268 (8th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Weems appeals the district court’s¹ adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. [269]*269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).

Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mark Weems appeals the district court’s¹ adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. [269]*269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).

Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 F. App'x 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weems-v-timberlands-ca8-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack