Weems v. Timberlands

Eighth Circuit

Weems v. Timberlands

123 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2005·No. No. 04-2031·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Weems appeals the district court’s¹ adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. [269]*269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).

Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mark Weems appeals the district court’s¹ adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. [269]*269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).

Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Weems v. Timberlands, 123 F. App'x 268 (8th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

123 F. App'x 268 (Weems v. Timberlands) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related