Weems v. Hotard

178 So. 2d 349
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 2, 1965
DocketNo. F-445
StatusPublished

This text of 178 So. 2d 349 (Weems v. Hotard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weems v. Hotard, 178 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Steinberg v. Irwin Operating Co., 90 So.2d 460, 58 A.L.R.2d 1198 (Fla.1956), and McNulty v. Hurley, 97 So.2d 185 (Fla.1957).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and STUR-GIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNulty v. Hurley
97 So. 2d 185 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Steinberg v. Irwin Operating Co.
90 So. 2d 460 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 So. 2d 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weems-v-hotard-fladistctapp-1965.