Weeks Woodlands Ass'n v. Dormitory Authority
This text of 980 N.E.2d 532 (Weeks Woodlands Ass'n v. Dormitory Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Under the particular circumstances of this case, we agree with the Appellate Division majority that the challenged project is substantially complete and that the proper course of action was to dismiss the appeals taken to that Court as moot.
[921]*921Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
980 N.E.2d 532, 20 N.Y.3d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-woodlands-assn-v-dormitory-authority-ny-2012.