Weeks v. Weeks

246 S.E.2d 669, 241 Ga. 550, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weeks v. Weeks. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 Ga. 416
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 6, 1978·No. 33638·Published

Opinion

Hall, Justice.

This is an appeal by Mrs. Weeks from an adverse judgment in her contempt action against her former husband for failure to pay certain of her medical expenses.

That paragraph of the contract of the parties which was incorporated into their divorce decree, governing payment of medical expenses, was not so plain and unambiguous as to preclude parol evidence concerning the parties’ intent. Rodgers v. Rodgers, 234 Ga. 463 (216 SE2d 322) (1975). Moreover, such expenses, to be embraced within the paragraph, must be reasonable and necessary. Id.

The trial court found as a fact that the parties did not intend to require Mr. Weeks to pay the cost of the cosmetic [551]*551surgery here in issue, and further that his failure to pay did not constitute a wilful violation of the decree. The record contains support for those findings, and we will not disturb them on appeal.

Argued June 13, 1978 Decided July 6, 1978. Blackburn, Bright & Dodd, J. Converse Bright, Roger J. Dodd, for appellant. John R. Bennett, Willis L. Miller, III, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weeks v. Weeks, 246 S.E.2d 669, 241 Ga. 550, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1040 (Ga. 1978).

246 S.E.2d 669 (Weeks v. Weeks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodgers v. Rodgers
216 S.E.2d 322 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)