Weeks v. Weeks
This text of 246 S.E.2d 669 (Weeks v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by Mrs. Weeks from an adverse judgment in her contempt action against her former husband for failure to pay certain of her medical expenses.
That paragraph of the contract of the parties which was incorporated into their divorce decree, governing payment of medical expenses, was not so plain and unambiguous as to preclude parol evidence concerning the parties’ intent. Rodgers v. Rodgers, 234 Ga. 463 (216 SE2d 322) (1975). Moreover, such expenses, to be embraced within the paragraph, must be reasonable and necessary. Id.
The trial court found as a fact that the parties did not intend to require Mr. Weeks to pay the cost of the cosmetic [551]*551surgery here in issue, and further that his failure to pay did not constitute a wilful violation of the decree. The record contains support for those findings, and we will not disturb them on appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 S.E.2d 669, 241 Ga. 550, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-weeks-ga-1978.