Weeks v. State
Opinion
Demetrius Weeks challenges his malice murder conviction for the shooting death of Curtis Tarver.1 Finding that there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, we affirm.
The evidence shows that a neighborhood resident heard three [578]*578gunshots, a person crying inside a house, and someone saying, “Shorty Red, why did you shoot me?” The witness identified Weeks as the man carrying a handgun as he left the house where the shooting occurred. Before dying, Tarver told police that Shorty Red shot him. A second witness testified that Weeks was known as Shorty Red. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Weeks guilty of the crime charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
458 S.E.2d 851 (Weeks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.