Weeks v. State

42 So. 3d 962, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12735, 2010 WL 3419973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 2010·No. 2D10-895·Published

Opinion

KHOUZAM, Judge.

The order of the postconviction court denying David Weeks’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right that Weeks may have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weeks v. State, 42 So. 3d 962, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12735, 2010 WL 3419973 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

42 So. 3d 962 (Weeks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Children and Families v. TT
42 So. 3d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)