Weeks v. State

651 So. 2d 831, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2652, 1995 WL 111765
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 1995·No. No. 93-2970·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appealing a sentence imposed for attempted aggravated battery, appellant argues the lower court erred by not establishing a specific amount of restitution and instead delegating the probation officer the responsibility of determining the appropriate amount of restitution. The state concedes error. It is well-established that restitution must be established by the sentencing court. See, e.g., Gray v. State, 535 So.2d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Therefore, we REVERSE in part and REMAND for proceedings related to the imposition of restitution and for amendment of the probation orders regarding restitution, but appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence are otherwise AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weeks v. State, 651 So. 2d 831, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2652, 1995 WL 111765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

651 So. 2d 831 (Weeks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stevens v. State
651 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)