Weeks v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Weeks v. State

113 So. 919, 22 Ala. App. 696

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 2, 1927

Docket8 Div. 552.

StatusPublished

This text of 113 So. 919 (Weeks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weeks v. State, 113 So. 919, 22 Ala. App. 696 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was convicted for the unlawful-possession of a still, and appealed. Upon an examination of the evidence, we find it ample to support the verdict of the jury, and to sustain the judgment of conviction. The facts, being in conflict, presented a jury question.- The points of decision here presented have been examined and considered. Each of the exceptions reserved to the court’s rulings is clearly without merit. No extended discussion is deemed necessary. The record proper being regular in all things, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was convicted for the unlawful-possession of a still, and appealed. Upon an examination of the evidence, we find it ample to support the verdict of the jury, and to sustain the judgment of conviction. The facts, being in conflict, presented a jury question.- The points of decision here presented have been examined and considered. Each of the exceptions reserved to the court’s rulings is clearly without merit. No extended discussion is deemed necessary. The record proper being regular in all things, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 919, 22 Ala. App. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-state-alactapp-1927.