Weeks v. Payne

Supreme Court

Weeks v. Payne

140 S. Ct. 2794, 206 L. Ed. 2d 934

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 18, 2020

DocketNo. 19-8064.

StatusPublished

This text of 140 S. Ct. 2794 (Weeks v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weeks v. Payne, 140 S. Ct. 2794, 206 L. Ed. 2d 934 (U.S. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for *2795writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for *2795writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam ).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 S. Ct. 2794, 206 L. Ed. 2d 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-payne-scotus-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack