Weeks v. Lister
This text of 53 A. 1125 (Weeks v. Lister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court will not recall this record from the court of chancery. There has been no mistake in setting forth in the decree the real judgment of the court, upon any matter upon which an opinion has been given. The application will be denied.
The application for counsel fees should first be made in this court. If the court then passes on it, the decision is final, but if the court does not pass on it, or if through mere inadvertance the application for counsel fees is not made while the case is before this court, then after the remittitur, the court of chancery has jurisdiction to grant counsel fees and printing in the court of errors and appeals upon a proper case being presented in these respects.
[Application denied. No vote.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 A. 1125, 62 N.J. Eq. 813, 17 Dickinson 813, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-lister-nj-1901.