Weeks v. Kramer
This text of 701 A.2d 339 (Weeks v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 319 (AC 15686), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court holding that the plaintiff could not enforce the restrictive covenant that had been created by the parties’ predecessor in title, Hudson Nut Products, Inc., and finding that it did not run with the land?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
701 A.2d 339, 243 Conn. 917, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-kramer-conn-1997.