Weeks v. Kramer
701 A.2d 339, 243 Conn. 917, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 409
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 319 (AC 15686), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court holding that the plaintiff could not enforce the restrictive covenant that had been created by the parties’ predecessor in title, Hudson Nut Products, Inc., and finding that it did not run with the land?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weeks v. Kramer, 701 A.2d 339, 243 Conn. 917, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 409 (Colo. 1997).
701 A.2d 339 (Weeks v. Kramer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weeks v. Kramer
707 A.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)