Weeks v. Kramer

701 A.2d 339, 243 Conn. 917, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 409
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 22, 1997
DocketSC 15764
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 A.2d 339 (Weeks v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weeks v. Kramer, 701 A.2d 339, 243 Conn. 917, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 409 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 319 (AC 15686), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court holding that the plaintiff could not enforce the restrictive covenant that had been created by the parties’ predecessor in title, Hudson Nut Products, Inc., and finding that it did not run with the land?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weeks v. Kramer
707 A.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 A.2d 339, 243 Conn. 917, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-kramer-conn-1997.