Weeks v. Harriman
This text of 18 A. 87 (Weeks v. Harriman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Vermont judgment pleaded here in bar of the maintenance of the action was rendered by a court having jurisdiction of the parties and cause of action, and in the regular course of procedure upon a plea of the statute of limitations in bar of the plaintiff’s right of action. Such a judgment, conclusive against the plaintiff’s right of action in Vermont, where it was rendered, is conclusive everywhere when pleaded in a suit between the same parties and on the same cause of action. The fact that the judgment was rendered upon the plea of the statute of limitations alone does not make it any less conclusive in character. The plaintiff’s claim was merged in the judgment by which its further prosecution is barred. Sanderson v. Peabody, 58 N. H. 116, 119.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 A. 87, 65 N.H. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-harriman-nh-1888.