Weeks v. Dennett

62 N.H. 2
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1882
StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 2 (Weeks v. Dennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weeks v. Dennett, 62 N.H. 2 (N.H. 1882).

Opinion

*3 Doe, C. J.

Authority expressly or impliedly conferred upon the assessors by the legislature cannot be altered by the council. The assessors have an incidental power to choose one of themselves clerk of the board as often as they see fit; and in a matter thus left to their discretion by the state, they cannot be controlled by the city. The charter of Concord authorizes the council to make “ ordinances, rules, regulations, and by-laws ” for certain purposes, and to “ make any other by-laws and regulations which may seem for the well-being of said city, provided they be not repugnant to the constitution or laws of New Hampshire.” Laws 1849, c. 885, s. 17. And the council have “power to provide for the appointment or election of all necessary officers for the good government of the city not otherwise provided for, and to prescribe their duties and fix their compensation.” Gen. Laws, c. 48, s. 2. But these statutes do not authorize the city government to deprive the assessors of the power of determining when they will choose a clerk.

Petition dismissed.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.H. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeks-v-dennett-nh-1882.