Weekley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weekley v. State

636 So. 2d 896, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 201404

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1994·No. No. 93-1053·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion for postconvietion relief. Defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating “that his counsel did not provide reasonably effective performance and that, absent counsel’s deficient performance, the jury would have reached a different result.” Williams v. State, 515 So.2d 1042, 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The trial court properly determined that defendant was not entitled to relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion for postconvietion relief. Defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating “that his counsel did not provide reasonably effective performance and that, absent counsel’s deficient performance, the jury would have reached a different result.” Williams v. State, 515 So.2d 1042, 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The trial court properly determined that defendant was not entitled to relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Affirmed.

Weekley v. State, 636 So. 2d 896, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 201404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

636 So. 2d 896 (Weekley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related