Weekley v. State

636 So. 2d 896, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 201404
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 24, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1053
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 636 So. 2d 896 (Weekley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weekley v. State, 636 So. 2d 896, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 201404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion for postconvietion relief. Defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating “that his counsel did not provide reasonably effective performance and that, absent counsel’s deficient performance, the jury would have reached a different result.” Williams v. State, 515 So.2d 1042, 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The trial court properly determined that defendant was not entitled to relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. State
672 So. 2d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
636 So. 2d 896, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 201404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weekley-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.