Weekley v. State
This text of 636 So. 2d 896 (Weekley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion for postconvietion relief. Defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating “that his counsel did not provide reasonably effective performance and that, absent counsel’s deficient performance, the jury would have reached a different result.” Williams v. State, 515 So.2d 1042, 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The trial court properly determined that defendant was not entitled to relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
636 So. 2d 896, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4984, 1994 WL 201404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weekley-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.