Weekes v. Heimann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Weekes v. Heimann

133 N.W. 208, 90 Neb. 173, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 341

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 14, 1911

DocketNo. 16,556

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 N.W. 208 (Weekes v. Heimann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weekes v. Heimann, 133 N.W. 208, 90 Neb. 173, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 341 (Neb. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Barnes, J.

This was an action in ejectment to recover possession of an undivided one-fourth of the same tract of land which was in controversy in Kulp v. Heimann, ante, p. 167. The pleadings were similar to those in that case, with the exception of a plea of the statute of limitations, which was there interposed. The evidence in both cases was practically the same. Defendants had the judgment, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Following the decision in that case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes, J.

This was an action in ejectment to recover possession of an undivided one-fourth of the same tract of land which was in controversy in Kulp v. Heimann, ante, p. 167. The pleadings were similar to those in that case, with the exception of a plea of the statute of limitations, which was there interposed. The evidence in both cases was practically the same. Defendants had the judgment, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Following the decision in that case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 N.W. 208, 90 Neb. 173, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weekes-v-heimann-neb-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack