Weekes v. Heimann
133 N.W. 208, 90 Neb. 173, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 341
Opinion
This was an action in ejectment to recover possession of an undivided one-fourth of the same tract of land which was in controversy in Kulp v. Heimann, ante, p. 167. The pleadings were similar to those in that case, with the exception of a plea of the statute of limitations, which was there interposed. The evidence in both cases was practically the same. Defendants had the judgment, and the plaintiff has appealed.
Following the decision in that case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weekes v. Heimann, 133 N.W. 208, 90 Neb. 173, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 341 (Neb. 1911).
133 N.W. 208 (Weekes v. Heimann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Battey v. Battey
144 N.W. 786 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1913)