Weekes v. Cottingham

58 Ga. 559
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 Ga. 559 (Weekes v. Cottingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weekes v. Cottingham, 58 Ga. 559 (Ga. 1877).

Opinion

Bleckley, Judge.

1. When the action is by a widow for the homicide of her husband, the failure to allege a prosecution for the homicide as a crime is amendable; and if one of the defendant’s pleas, found in the record, admit the prosecution, there is no occasion for the plaintiff to prove it.

2. If in resisting a battery, the assailant be wilfully slain, his widow may recover damages, unless the homicide is justifiable. If it amount either to murder or voluntary manslaughter, it is a cause of action. The aggressive conduct of the deeased, and his unlawful violence, will go in mitigation of damages.

3. In charging the jury, the judge may state what either party admits or contends for ; and the statement, when insisted upon as error, will be taken to refer to what transpired [563]*563at the trial in open court, and to be true, unless it be otherwise represented in the bill of exceptions — 56 Ga., 365.

4. The verdict is warranted by the evidence, as well in respect to the plaintiff’s being the widow of the deceased, as to all other material matters.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
60 S.E. 840 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Chattanooga, Rome & Columbus Railroad v. Huggins
15 S.E. 848 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ga. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weekes-v-cottingham-ga-1877.