Weehawken Wharf Co. v. Knickerbocker Coal Co.
22 Misc. 768
This text of 22 Misc. 768 (Weehawken Wharf Co. v. Knickerbocker Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weehawken Wharf Co. v. Knickerbocker Coal Co., 22 Misc. 768 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the attachment the
The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.' . The papers upon which said attachment'was. granted were more than: sufficient.
Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., O’Dwveb and MoGabthy, JJ.
Order affirmed,, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 Misc. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weehawken-wharf-co-v-knickerbocker-coal-co-nynyccityct-1898.