Weeden v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Virginia

Weeden v. Bartlett

6 Va. 123

DecidedFebruary 20, 1818

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 123 (Weeden v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weeden v. Bartlett, 6 Va. 123 (Va. 1818).

Pincite

Opinion

A Supersedeas to the Judgment of reversal was granted; and the following was the opinion of this Court.

The Court,

not deciding absolutely that the judgment of the Superior Court, reversing that of the County-Court, is correct as to the reason therein alledged, is of opinion that, upon the merits, the same is not erroneous; the nuncupative Will not being duly proved, as such, by two witnesses pursuant to the provisions of the Act of [125]*125Assembly in such case made and provided.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A Supersedeas to the Judgment of reversal was granted; and the following was the opinion of this Court.

The Court,

not deciding absolutely that the judgment of the Superior Court, reversing that of the County-Court, is correct as to the reason therein alledged, is of opinion that, upon the merits, the same is not erroneous; the nuncupative Will not being duly proved, as such, by two witnesses pursuant to the provisions of the Act of [125]*125Assembly in such case made and provided.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weeden-v-bartlett-va-1818.