Weed v. Waterbury

5 Redf. 114
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Redf. 114 (Weed v. Waterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weed v. Waterbury, 5 Redf. 114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

The Surrogate.

I see no necessity for either such a reference, or the appointment of a temporary administrator ; for, assuming that the decedent was not a resident of this State at the time of his decease, yet having left assets in this county, the Surrogate has jurisdiction to appoint an administrator (3 R. S., 76 [6 ed.], § 24, subd. 2); and the application for ancillary letters does not prevent the issuing of letters to this petitioner (see Code. Civ. Pro., % 2696, subd. 2), as the petitioner is a relative of decedent, legally competent to act, and has made application to the Surrogate having jurisdiction, and the application has not been finally disposed of.

I am, therefore, of the opinion that, on giving the [116]*116requisite security, the petitioner is entitled to letters. This determination is independent of the question of the residence; and the rights of all parties may be protected upon that question on the final accounting and the distribution of the estate.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Tanskanen
191 Misc. 518 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1948)
Lussen v. Timmerman
4 Dem. Sur. 250 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Redf. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weed-v-waterbury-nysurct-1881.