Weed v. State

315 So. 2d 521, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14283
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 1975·No. No. 74-242·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record reveals sufficient evidence to support the conviction. Although the state made improper inquiry into appellant’s arrest record, we consider that error here to be harmless, Harden v. State, 303 So.2d 679 (4th DCA Fla.1974); Whitehead v. State, 279 So.2d 99 (2d DCA Fla.1973).

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weed v. State, 315 So. 2d 521, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

315 So. 2d 521 (Weed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitehead v. State
279 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Harden v. State
303 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)